Accused of sexual assault, previous Tinder CEO sues their accuser for defamation

Accused of sexual assault, previous Tinder CEO sues their accuser for defamation

The onetime chief executive of Tinder and its parent companies Match Group and IAC, sexually harassed and assaulted her at a company Christmas party in 2016 in August, a former vice president at Tinder filed a lawsuit alleging that Greg Blatt.

On Thursday, Blatt filed a defamation suit against their accuser, Rosette Pambakian, and against Tinder’s co-founder and former CEO Sean Rad, alleging that the intimate battery pack accusations are included in a smear campaign designed to provide Rad and Pambakian leverage in an independent multibillion-dollar legal battle within the value of Tinder stock.

“Rad and Pambakian have tried to weaponize a significant movement that is social” the defamation suit alleges, “undermining the plight of real victims of sexual punishment by simply making false accusations in cynical search for a $2 billion windfall.”

Orin Snyder, a legal professional for Pambakian and Rad, called Blatt’s suit “a new low for IAC/Match and their previous CEO. They continue steadily to retaliate against and smear a victim of intimate attack while the individual who reported it. Their assaults derive from lies and papers which can be removed from context. Whenever most of the proof concerns light, it shall be apparent just what took place right here. It’s shameful why these general public businesses are continuing to protect the truth up.”

A spokeswoman for Match Group stated neither the ongoing business nor its moms and dad is an event to Blatt’s suit.

Pambakian’s August suit painted an image of a Blatt that is drunken making improvements during the period of the celebration during the SLS resort in Beverly Hills, culminating in an event in an accommodation, along with other Tinder workers current, in which Blatt presumably pinned Pambakian to a bed and started “forcibly groping [Pambakian’s] breasts and legs, and kissing her arms, throat and upper body.”

Blatt’s defamation suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Ca, presents a different account of this night. In accordance with Blatt, he and Pambakian flirted over the course of the party, culminating in a consensual kiss in a hotel space. The suit contends that Blatt and Pambakian had an in depth and mutually admiring relationship both before and following the vacation celebration, saying “a flurry of friendly communications exchanged the following early morning between Pambakian and Blatt by which they joked about their hangovers belie Pambakian’s assertion that she thought she have been assaulted by Blatt just hours early in the day.”

Noting that Pambakian by herself never ever formally reported the incident, the suit alleges it only stumbled on light as a result of the efforts of Rad, and just after negotiations on the valuation of Rad’s Tinder investment fell aside. Rad reported it to business officials per week after telling their monetary consultant, in an email about Blatt: “We are in war. We will destroy him,” according to Blatt’s suit.

An investigation that is internal Rad’s formal problem discovered that Blatt hadn’t violated what the law states or business policy. Based on Blatt’s suit, “[t]he board did, nevertheless, agree with Blatt which he had exercised bad judgment. The board determined that an appropriate reprimand was to cancel an option grant Blatt had been scheduled to receive in early May worth millions of dollars as a result. Blatt accepted their punishment without objection.” Blatt left the company at the conclusion of 2017.

As proof that Pambakian had a motive that is financial misrepresenting the incident, Blatt’s suit tips to a silly litigation funding contract between her and Rad that promised her upfront and contingent payments totaling huge amount of money in return for taking part in the lawsuit on the valuation of colombian cupid    support Tinder and including her harassment claim for the reason that suit. Blatt alleges this contract ended up being Rad’s technique for damaging his credibility as a witness into the valuation situation.

“In essence, Rad had been ready to spend Pambakian out of their pocket that is own in to convince her to participate the valuation lawsuit,” Blatt’s issue claims. “This arrangement just made feeling from Rad’s viewpoint if he thought that Pambakian’s participation would increase their possibility of success when you look at the suit.”

Snyder, the lawyer for Rad and Pambakian, has stated the repayments had been payment for the value of Pambakian’s commodity, which Match Group canceled after she joined up with the lawsuit.

Blatt’s defamation suit joins a flurry of appropriate actions surrounding Tinder’s corporate methods, none of which include present workers or supervisors during the dating that is popular business or its owners, though several target the business it self.

Into the main $2-billion lawsuit resistant to the business, which will be working its means through the courts in ny state, Tinder co-founder Rad and an amount of previous Tinder professionals declare that IAC and its own dating application subsidiary Match Group (that also has Hinge and OkCupid) purposely undervalued the business in order to avoid having to pay billions in stock choices to the first group that developed the swipe-to-match dating app.

Pambakian initially made her intimate battery claims against Blatt public year that is last element of that bigger suit, but withdrew after discovering that she had finalized an arbitration agreement utilizing the business. Tinder fired her in December; the stand-alone suit against Blatt plus the business that Pambakian filed in August alleges, as well as intimate battery pack and harassment, that her shooting ended up being retaliation on her behalf involvement in the stock prices suit. (Match CEO Mandy Ginsberg has said it absolutely was required to terminate Pambakian as the general public nature of her participation into the lawsuit clashed together with her duties as a spokeswoman that is public Tinder, and because she insisted on interacting through her solicitors for work-related things.)

In the Federal Trade Commission filed suit against Match Group, saying it deceived users into becoming subscribers by promoting the activities of what it knew to be spam or fraud accounts september. Match states the FTC “misrepresented interior e-mails and relied on cherry-picked information which will make crazy claims.”

Match has additionally involved with litigation against Bumble, an dating that is online co-founded by Whitney Wolfe Herd, an earlier Tinder worker. Wolfe Herd filed her very own high-profile intimate harassment claim against Tinder after dating and splitting up with co-founder Justin Mateen. In 2018, Match sued Bumble, alleging property that is intellectual, and Bumble sued right back, claiming Match fraudulently elicited trade secrets underneath the guise of purchase speaks. That dispute stays in progress.

Your help guide to our brand new financial truth.

Get our free company publication for insights and methods for getting by.

tender dating app review

You might sporadically get content that is promotional the l . a . Occasions.

Sam Dean is a business reporter for the l . a . Occasions within the technology industry in Southern Ca. He has got formerly worked as an attribute journalist for several publications including Newsweek, the Verge, 538 and happy Peach.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.